The US has ranked number one for the first time since 2016 in an annual listing of the top 40 renewable energy markets by professional services firm EY.

The latest Renewable Energy Country Attractiveness Index (RECAI) report considers the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, looking at the resiliency of countries in both health and economic terms, and ranks countries based on their attractiveness to renewable energy investors.

The US secured the top position largely because of a short-term extension to the Production Tax Credit and long-term growth in offshore wind, with plans to invest $57bn to install up to 30GW by 2030, EY said in its report.
China’s growth in renewables has slowed, as the government looks to wean the market off subsidies towards a more competitive landscape. This, coupled with reduced demand as a result of COVID-19, has caused China to drop to second in the index, but forecasts remain optimistic for long-term growth, the report said.

France has moved up from fourth position to third, securing strong power prices and awards of 1.4GW for wind and solar developers in its latest auction, as it gradually weans its grid off nuclear power.

The UK, ranked sixth, made a milestone proposal to re-include onshore wind and solar projects in the next contracts-for-difference auction, encouraging greater and more diverse renewable energy development.

Spain improved by four positions to rank eleventh, despite being hit hard by COVID-19, as climate and energy policy remains a high priority for the new coalition government. It has set out aggressive but achievable plans to increase wind and solar, and most investors remain positive about Spain’s medium-term prospects.

The RECAI report highlights how climate change and other environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues are being increasingly recognised as key determinants of a company’s future value creation potential, EY said in a statement.

Institutional investors are demanding that businesses not only deliver financial performance, but also show how they make a positive contribution to society, it said. As a result, companies are having to re-evaluate their corporate strategies to curb their emissions, enhance their governance, and improve their climate-related disclosures, EY said.

This has resulted in institutional investors increasing the capital they are allocating to renewable energy infrastructure as a means to hedge their climate exposure, said the report.

EY global power and utilities corporate finance leader and RECAI chief editor Ben Warren said: “There was much discussion around ESG earlier this year and this, along with climate change, is still the dominant long-term driver for renewable investment, despite COVID-19.

“As a result of the pandemic, pollution levels have fallen dramatically through reduced fossil fuel consumption. A greater focus on a sustainable long-term energy future therefore works in favour of clean energy, in particular wind and solar, together with storage.”

The EY report examines how large-scale energy storage is critical to decarbonise electricity systems, as well as the conditions needed to encourage investment in utility-scale battery storage. As electricity grids decarbonise, vast amounts of energy storage will be needed, and utilities and developers are slowly ramping up investments in large-scale batteries.

According to the report, 12.6GWh of battery storage is planned to be installed this year, making 2020 a record year for energy storage growth.

In the longer-term, a 13-fold increase in capacity growth, from around 17GWh currently to 230GWh by 2025, is anticipated.

EY global energy leader Benoit Laclau said: “This is a defining and transformative moment for the energy industry, despite the current crisis. Stakeholders are looking to collaborate and invest in companies where climate change and sustainable development is embedded in their strategy.

“Energy leaders should take action to invest in renewables and related sustainable long-term projects, including energy efficiency, smart power networks and low-carbon transport infrastructure.”

Retrieved from:

Author: starpow_oss